A Philosophical Perspective Blog Archive the liberals of the right and left of the Liberals
Do we know who they are liberals indicate the country? Some of us would say that liberals are leftists, but experience shows differently. One example of this is the newspaper of the country. Haaretz considered högdalen a liberal newspaper, but he holds the June-right political-economic line. It does not fall to the category of right-left cleanly.
Liberal is simply someone who advocates freedom for all people, as long as they do not try to violate the freedom of others. Freedom is the highest value (more precisely, the top value life, but freedom is derived automatically from a baseline that because without freedom there is no life). All other values (such as justice or peace or equality) are important to some extent, but always secondary.
If you look at Hlibertniim considered an economic right, they seem to think the opposite way from the left, but they are liberal. Hlibertnit ideology can be characterized as striving maximum personal freedom. It does so based on a free market, natural justice (fairness), and attempt to deal with anyone who tries to impose his views on the individual. According to the method Hlibertnit, a person can do whatever he wants depending on the amount of resources available to it, provided that will not harm the natural rights of others. Eyes Hlibertnim taxes are theft of property of the person. Hlibertniim opposed to harm the country's freedom and property of the person (? Harm). And oppose the government's authority (authority). Terms Hlibertnim government should be reduced to the minimum necessary. Hlibertnim employees are not fans associations that trigger aggression against the force business owners (ingroup). Hlibertnit agenda should be respected personal freedom. In other words, can be said clearly that Hlibertniim are liberal (how surprising)
Socialists are looking for the freedom högdalen of man weak against the capitalists. Instead högdalen of natural justice of Hlibertniim they like the distribution right (Fairness). Averse to hitting the weak (Harm). Do not like authority (the authority of capitalists) (Authority). The radical edge of the socialists do not like foundations (Ingroup), högdalen and prefer Workers of the world unite. And aesthetics högdalen is not a criterion for judging the value of a person (Purity).
Authority - the Socialists were based view of strong rule of the capitalists during the 19th century. The 19th century was characterized by increased industrial revolution, which resulted in the concentration of workers in cities, increasing groups of workers huddled högdalen in a given area, as well as a strong control of the factory owners for their employees. Socialists therefore sought ways Lhtshachrr from the yoke of the factory owners. So they developed the ideal of union workers, and the central control of workers' organizations. Hlibertnim accounted for Counter-Reformation (or Fra-Reformation), employees and Hbolisbyakim corporations, and therefore advocated personal freedom based on resources, and labor unions fought Cgd aggressive. Hlibertniim asked Lhtshachrr infant's central government Hmnhult by bureaucratic squalid, and therefore sought to reduce the central government, and allow private entrepreneurs to exploit its full potential.
Harm - Socialists rebelled against repressive capacity of the capitalists against the weak (in the 19th century has a record of violence-lethal against employee associations), as well as the repressive and exploitative of the European empires. Thus the myth was based employee banding together against employers sweatshops, and there is a need to break free of the shackles of the oppressed people of imperialism / capitalism depressing. Hlibertniim them, see how colonialism has created the foundation in World War I and II, and therefore flag freedom by the free trade of all peoples everywhere. Thus hoped Hlibertanim prevent wars. Interestingly, just before the Second World War, Roosevelt proposed to Hitler to participate in the free market. Hitler was loyal to the colonial ideology of the 19th century, did not understand Roosevelt's offer and went to war to obtain colonies in Russia and Eastern Europe. As we know, both he and we paid a heavy price for not understanding of Hitler in the new economy.
Libertarians are determined both in economic freedom, and the dimension of personal freedom. They are opposed not only to initiate power to impose economic principles, they also oppose the initiation of force to impose social principles (such as religion, högdalen gay marriage, and many libertarians who support abortion). Among the most vocal US against the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, you can find the libertarians. Congressman Ron Paul, for example, is a perfect example of a person who not only supports a free economy, but also opposes US military expeditions around the world. More than once he finds himself alone, in front of an entire congress, vote against the decisions of the United States in foreign affairs and security.
Nationalism is collectivism in every respect, and libertarians are anti-nationalist. They support free immigration, högdalen free international trade, and all those things nationalists oppose national and them. This is the reason that many social issues, Hlibertrainim will be on the "left" of the map, while economic issues - they will be on the right side of the map.
Libertarian understand högdalen - that personal freedom without economic freedom. He sees how the economic oppression of citizens can be used as easily as personal and social oppression of his. When Libtrian understand that trade is between people who agree freely and voluntarily make a replacement property - is opposed to dictation from the state on this issue, just as he is opposed to dictating issues such as alcohol, drugs or homosexuality.
Libertarians actually talking about empowering the individual, but they really are not opposed to trade unions. Free world, no one should stop you from power unionize. In fact - the body so that the left loves to hate is nothing short of a voluntary association of people - "the Corporation". There is no difference between corporations and unions, at least not in terms of individual freedom.
Socialists redefine concepts such as "damage" and Violence ". högdalen For them - everything
Do we know who they are liberals indicate the country? Some of us would say that liberals are leftists, but experience shows differently. One example of this is the newspaper of the country. Haaretz considered högdalen a liberal newspaper, but he holds the June-right political-economic line. It does not fall to the category of right-left cleanly.
Liberal is simply someone who advocates freedom for all people, as long as they do not try to violate the freedom of others. Freedom is the highest value (more precisely, the top value life, but freedom is derived automatically from a baseline that because without freedom there is no life). All other values (such as justice or peace or equality) are important to some extent, but always secondary.
If you look at Hlibertniim considered an economic right, they seem to think the opposite way from the left, but they are liberal. Hlibertnit ideology can be characterized as striving maximum personal freedom. It does so based on a free market, natural justice (fairness), and attempt to deal with anyone who tries to impose his views on the individual. According to the method Hlibertnit, a person can do whatever he wants depending on the amount of resources available to it, provided that will not harm the natural rights of others. Eyes Hlibertnim taxes are theft of property of the person. Hlibertniim opposed to harm the country's freedom and property of the person (? Harm). And oppose the government's authority (authority). Terms Hlibertnim government should be reduced to the minimum necessary. Hlibertnim employees are not fans associations that trigger aggression against the force business owners (ingroup). Hlibertnit agenda should be respected personal freedom. In other words, can be said clearly that Hlibertniim are liberal (how surprising)
Socialists are looking for the freedom högdalen of man weak against the capitalists. Instead högdalen of natural justice of Hlibertniim they like the distribution right (Fairness). Averse to hitting the weak (Harm). Do not like authority (the authority of capitalists) (Authority). The radical edge of the socialists do not like foundations (Ingroup), högdalen and prefer Workers of the world unite. And aesthetics högdalen is not a criterion for judging the value of a person (Purity).
Authority - the Socialists were based view of strong rule of the capitalists during the 19th century. The 19th century was characterized by increased industrial revolution, which resulted in the concentration of workers in cities, increasing groups of workers huddled högdalen in a given area, as well as a strong control of the factory owners for their employees. Socialists therefore sought ways Lhtshachrr from the yoke of the factory owners. So they developed the ideal of union workers, and the central control of workers' organizations. Hlibertnim accounted for Counter-Reformation (or Fra-Reformation), employees and Hbolisbyakim corporations, and therefore advocated personal freedom based on resources, and labor unions fought Cgd aggressive. Hlibertniim asked Lhtshachrr infant's central government Hmnhult by bureaucratic squalid, and therefore sought to reduce the central government, and allow private entrepreneurs to exploit its full potential.
Harm - Socialists rebelled against repressive capacity of the capitalists against the weak (in the 19th century has a record of violence-lethal against employee associations), as well as the repressive and exploitative of the European empires. Thus the myth was based employee banding together against employers sweatshops, and there is a need to break free of the shackles of the oppressed people of imperialism / capitalism depressing. Hlibertniim them, see how colonialism has created the foundation in World War I and II, and therefore flag freedom by the free trade of all peoples everywhere. Thus hoped Hlibertanim prevent wars. Interestingly, just before the Second World War, Roosevelt proposed to Hitler to participate in the free market. Hitler was loyal to the colonial ideology of the 19th century, did not understand Roosevelt's offer and went to war to obtain colonies in Russia and Eastern Europe. As we know, both he and we paid a heavy price for not understanding of Hitler in the new economy.
Libertarians are determined both in economic freedom, and the dimension of personal freedom. They are opposed not only to initiate power to impose economic principles, they also oppose the initiation of force to impose social principles (such as religion, högdalen gay marriage, and many libertarians who support abortion). Among the most vocal US against the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, you can find the libertarians. Congressman Ron Paul, for example, is a perfect example of a person who not only supports a free economy, but also opposes US military expeditions around the world. More than once he finds himself alone, in front of an entire congress, vote against the decisions of the United States in foreign affairs and security.
Nationalism is collectivism in every respect, and libertarians are anti-nationalist. They support free immigration, högdalen free international trade, and all those things nationalists oppose national and them. This is the reason that many social issues, Hlibertrainim will be on the "left" of the map, while economic issues - they will be on the right side of the map.
Libertarian understand högdalen - that personal freedom without economic freedom. He sees how the economic oppression of citizens can be used as easily as personal and social oppression of his. When Libtrian understand that trade is between people who agree freely and voluntarily make a replacement property - is opposed to dictation from the state on this issue, just as he is opposed to dictating issues such as alcohol, drugs or homosexuality.
Libertarians actually talking about empowering the individual, but they really are not opposed to trade unions. Free world, no one should stop you from power unionize. In fact - the body so that the left loves to hate is nothing short of a voluntary association of people - "the Corporation". There is no difference between corporations and unions, at least not in terms of individual freedom.
Socialists redefine concepts such as "damage" and Violence ". högdalen For them - everything
No comments:
Post a Comment